<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The dangers of scores in decision making</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jtonedm.com/2009/07/27/the-dangers-of-scores-in-decision-making/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jtonedm.com/2009/07/27/the-dangers-of-scores-in-decision-making/</link>
	<description>James Taylor on Everything Decision Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dangers of Scores in Decision Making &#8212; From James Taylor &#124; Welcome to Big Sky Associates</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2009/07/27/the-dangers-of-scores-in-decision-making/comment-page-1/#comment-21053</link>
		<dc:creator>Dangers of Scores in Decision Making &#8212; From James Taylor &#124; Welcome to Big Sky Associates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 22:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/?p=2292#comment-21053</guid>
		<description>[...] who we&#8217;ve referenced on this blog on several occasions, shared his thoughts today on the dangers of scores in decision making. He provides a great example: the Body Mass Index (BMI), which is fraught with issues but is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] who we&#8217;ve referenced on this blog on several occasions, shared his thoughts today on the dangers of scores in decision making. He provides a great example: the Body Mass Index (BMI), which is fraught with issues but is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2009/07/27/the-dangers-of-scores-in-decision-making/comment-page-1/#comment-14710</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/?p=2292#comment-14710</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, sometimes it’s hard (or costly) to go against prior probabilities and get more knowledge to make a clever decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, sometimes it’s hard (or costly) to go against prior probabilities and get more knowledge to make a clever decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Eastwood</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2009/07/27/the-dangers-of-scores-in-decision-making/comment-page-1/#comment-14688</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Eastwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/?p=2292#comment-14688</guid>
		<description>James,

   I think you make a valid point here. The score, by itself, is a piece of data/information. The score has never been, itself, the decision. A score is intended to be used in a context such as granting credit or the airline passenger context you mention.  I think you are right on the nose here, incorporating a score into a decision system both helps eliminate using it incorectly and the potential for bias. Both the &quot;rules&quot; and the score work together to make the decision in a systematic way. I&#039;ve seen instances of organizations implementing scoring who didn&#039;t understand how the decision strategy (aka rules) worked together and therefore received poor results or a significantly reduced benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>   I think you make a valid point here. The score, by itself, is a piece of data/information. The score has never been, itself, the decision. A score is intended to be used in a context such as granting credit or the airline passenger context you mention.  I think you are right on the nose here, incorporating a score into a decision system both helps eliminate using it incorectly and the potential for bias. Both the &#8220;rules&#8221; and the score work together to make the decision in a systematic way. I&#8217;ve seen instances of organizations implementing scoring who didn&#8217;t understand how the decision strategy (aka rules) worked together and therefore received poor results or a significantly reduced benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sébastien Derivaux</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2009/07/27/the-dangers-of-scores-in-decision-making/comment-page-1/#comment-14684</link>
		<dc:creator>Sébastien Derivaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/?p=2292#comment-14684</guid>
		<description>The problem is to have a human at the end of the decision process. The next problem is that this human should use the predicted score  as what it is, a hint only and not rely too much on it.

Nevertheless, sometimes it&#039;s hard (or costly) to go against prior probabilities and get more knowledge to make a clever decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is to have a human at the end of the decision process. The next problem is that this human should use the predicted score  as what it is, a hint only and not rely too much on it.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, sometimes it&#8217;s hard (or costly) to go against prior probabilities and get more knowledge to make a clever decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

