<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hardcoding + procedural code = bad news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jtonedm.com/2009/01/13/hardcoding-procedural-code-bad-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jtonedm.com/2009/01/13/hardcoding-procedural-code-bad-news/</link>
	<description>James Taylor on Everything Decision Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:47:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Here&#8217;s a couple of skills developers will need in the years ahead &#187; JT on EDM</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2009/01/13/hardcoding-procedural-code-bad-news/comment-page-1/#comment-13938</link>
		<dc:creator>Here&#8217;s a couple of skills developers will need in the years ahead &#187; JT on EDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/?p=1182#comment-13938</guid>
		<description>[...] developers will finally realize that declarative and model-driven approaches should replace hard-coding in a procedural language? Using a BPMS to specify workflow and process, a BRMS to specify business logic and a BI tool to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] developers will finally realize that declarative and model-driven approaches should replace hard-coding in a procedural language? Using a BPMS to specify workflow and process, a BRMS to specify business logic and a BI tool to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business Rules to Programmers - Methink thou doest protest too much III &#187; JT on EDM</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2009/01/13/hardcoding-procedural-code-bad-news/comment-page-1/#comment-13198</link>
		<dc:creator>Business Rules to Programmers - Methink thou doest protest too much III &#187; JT on EDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/?p=1182#comment-13198</guid>
		<description>[...] it easier to do so for them and provide much better compliance and audit capabilities. As I said in Hardcoding + procedural code = bad news it is not hard-coding per se that is bad but hard-coding in an old-school, procedural [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it easier to do so for them and provide much better compliance and audit capabilities. As I said in Hardcoding + procedural code = bad news it is not hard-coding per se that is bad but hard-coding in an old-school, procedural [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Palermo</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2009/01/13/hardcoding-procedural-code-bad-news/comment-page-1/#comment-13044</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Palermo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/?p=1182#comment-13044</guid>
		<description>Good points.  As with any principle, it can be under or over-applied, and you have to do critical analysis during the project.   There is no one-size-fits-all rule for this kind of thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points.  As with any principle, it can be under or over-applied, and you have to do critical analysis during the project.   There is no one-size-fits-all rule for this kind of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->