<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Look &#8211; Drools 5.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jtonedm.com/2008/10/14/first-look-drools-50/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jtonedm.com/2008/10/14/first-look-drools-50/</link>
	<description>James Taylor on Everything Decision Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:10:43 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MehdiCHM</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2008/10/14/first-look-drools-50/comment-page-1/#comment-19624</link>
		<dc:creator>MehdiCHM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/?p=610#comment-19624</guid>
		<description>I want to ask you if drools 5 have the concept of &quot;Machine learning or rule learner&quot;. It&#039;s for automatic reproduction of rules.
And the rule Compressor and validation of rules(contradiction between rules,...)

Thanks for answering Me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to ask you if drools 5 have the concept of &#8220;Machine learning or rule learner&#8221;. It&#8217;s for automatic reproduction of rules.<br />
And the rule Compressor and validation of rules(contradiction between rules,&#8230;)</p>
<p>Thanks for answering Me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business Rules performance — JT on EDM</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2008/10/14/first-look-drools-50/comment-page-1/#comment-14625</link>
		<dc:creator>Business Rules performance — JT on EDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/?p=610#comment-14625</guid>
		<description>[...] Ralph and Steve over at Illation have begun publishing about the new business rule engine benchmarks they have put together. First up is Drools &#8211; a nice detailed post comparing Drools 4 and Drools 5. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ralph and Steve over at Illation have begun publishing about the new business rule engine benchmarks they have put together. First up is Drools &#8211; a nice detailed post comparing Drools 4 and Drools 5. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Source Enterprise Business Rules Arrive &#187; JT on EDM</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2008/10/14/first-look-drools-50/comment-page-1/#comment-14310</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source Enterprise Business Rules Arrive &#187; JT on EDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/?p=610#comment-14310</guid>
		<description>[...] is the official release day for the new release of JBoss Enterprise BRMS - Drools 5.0 as was. Key features in this release are the repository/repository management tools and the new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the official release day for the new release of JBoss Enterprise BRMS &#8211; Drools 5.0 as was. Key features in this release are the repository/repository management tools and the new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A new book on open source business rules &#187; JT on EDM</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2008/10/14/first-look-drools-50/comment-page-1/#comment-14294</link>
		<dc:creator>A new book on open source business rules &#187; JT on EDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/?p=610#comment-14294</guid>
		<description>[...] Drools 5, JBoss and the open source community have delivered a true business rules management system for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Drools 5, JBoss and the open source community have delivered a true business rules management system for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Java Programming News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Drooling for Drool 5.0 - JavaProNews.com</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2008/10/14/first-look-drools-50/comment-page-1/#comment-11407</link>
		<dc:creator>Java Programming News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Drooling for Drool 5.0 - JavaProNews.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/?p=610#comment-11407</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments About The AuthorVP of Product Marketing with a passion for the technologies of decision automation. 15 years designing, developing, releasing and marketing advanced enterprise software platforms and development tools. Across the board experience in software development, engineering and product management and product marketing. http://www.edmblog.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments About The AuthorVP of Product Marketing with a passion for the technologies of decision automation. 15 years designing, developing, releasing and marketing advanced enterprise software platforms and development tools. Across the board experience in software development, engineering and product management and product marketing. <a href="http://www.edmblog.com">http://www.edmblog.com</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rascunho &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-10-16</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2008/10/14/first-look-drools-50/comment-page-1/#comment-11394</link>
		<dc:creator>rascunho &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-10-16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/?p=610#comment-11394</guid>
		<description>[...] First Look - Drools 5.0  » Smart (Enough) Systems, the blog If the commercial vendors did not think they had a real competition on their hands, Mark and his team will prove them wrong with 5.0. (tags: smartenoughsystems.com 2008 mes9 dia16 Drools regras ***** blog_post) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First Look &#8211; Drools 5.0  » Smart (Enough) Systems, the blog If the commercial vendors did not think they had a real competition on their hands, Mark and his team will prove them wrong with 5.0. (tags: <a href="http://smartenoughsystems.com" title="http://smartenoughsystems.com" class="autohyperlink" target="_blank">smartenoughsystems.com</a> 2008 mes9 dia16 Drools regras ***** blog_post) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter lin</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2008/10/14/first-look-drools-50/comment-page-1/#comment-11383</link>
		<dc:creator>peter lin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/?p=610#comment-11383</guid>
		<description>Hi james,

I agree with you drools 5 is making great progress. There&#039;s one thing I would like to point out about drools 5, which should cause concern for users. The &quot;new&quot; asymmetrical Rete feature is a big mistake in my mind. It is equivalent to telling users &quot;go ahead and modify the database file directly and by pass the database.&quot; Clearly, that is wrong and violates well established transaction theory and practice. I&#039;ve tried my best to convince drools to go with a simpler approach, which gives users the option of telling the engine which facts should be shadowed. The current drools api has insert(Object).   The simpler solution is to add a new method insert(Object, boolean shadowed). This is more flexible and gives users the choice. Plus, it doesn&#039;t violate transaction principles. I know mark has been hyping asymmetrical for almost a year now. As far as I&#039;m concerned, it&#039;s a step backwards for rule engines.

Having said that, I think the over all suite is still solid and users should continue to use it. I still recommend it to developers who ask me. I caution people not to use the new asymmetric feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi james,</p>
<p>I agree with you drools 5 is making great progress. There&#8217;s one thing I would like to point out about drools 5, which should cause concern for users. The &#8220;new&#8221; asymmetrical Rete feature is a big mistake in my mind. It is equivalent to telling users &#8220;go ahead and modify the database file directly and by pass the database.&#8221; Clearly, that is wrong and violates well established transaction theory and practice. I&#8217;ve tried my best to convince drools to go with a simpler approach, which gives users the option of telling the engine which facts should be shadowed. The current drools api has insert(Object).   The simpler solution is to add a new method insert(Object, boolean shadowed). This is more flexible and gives users the choice. Plus, it doesn&#8217;t violate transaction principles. I know mark has been hyping asymmetrical for almost a year now. As far as I&#8217;m concerned, it&#8217;s a step backwards for rule engines.</p>
<p>Having said that, I think the over all suite is still solid and users should continue to use it. I still recommend it to developers who ask me. I caution people not to use the new asymmetric feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Owen</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2008/10/14/first-look-drools-50/comment-page-1/#comment-11381</link>
		<dc:creator>James Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/?p=610#comment-11381</guid>
		<description>James - Nice review for a one-afternoon walk-through.   :-)   I&#039;ve been promising and promising Mark that I would help with 5.0 but I think I&#039;m too late for that one - maybe 5.5 or something...   What I&#039;m really interested in is stretching it to the limits of its use and doing a full comparison to ILOG JRules and Blaze Advisor, both of which I know (for now) better than Drools.   Maybe by the first of the year I can say something really intelligent about it but, for now, I&#039;ll withhold judgement.   


You are right about one thing though; the commercial vendors such as Fair Isaac and ILOG (now IBM) had better watch their rearview mirrors really closely because there is an open source product (Drools) coming up their backdraft really quickly.   Maybe not 5.0 but 5.5 or 6.0 (unless both improve dramatically) should make the market place really interesting.


SDG
jco</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James &#8211; Nice review for a one-afternoon walk-through.   :-)   I&#8217;ve been promising and promising Mark that I would help with 5.0 but I think I&#8217;m too late for that one &#8211; maybe 5.5 or something&#8230;   What I&#8217;m really interested in is stretching it to the limits of its use and doing a full comparison to ILOG JRules and Blaze Advisor, both of which I know (for now) better than Drools.   Maybe by the first of the year I can say something really intelligent about it but, for now, I&#8217;ll withhold judgement.   </p>
<p>You are right about one thing though; the commercial vendors such as Fair Isaac and ILOG (now IBM) had better watch their rearview mirrors really closely because there is an open source product (Drools) coming up their backdraft really quickly.   Maybe not 5.0 but 5.5 or 6.0 (unless both improve dramatically) should make the market place really interesting.</p>
<p>SDG<br />
jco</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->