<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here&#8217;s how EDM addresses a gap in Model Driven Engineering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jtonedm.com/2008/03/14/heres-how-edm-addresses-a-gap-in-model-driven-engineering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jtonedm.com/2008/03/14/heres-how-edm-addresses-a-gap-in-model-driven-engineering/</link>
	<description>James Taylor on Everything Decision Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decision Management and software development II - Model Driven Engineering &#187; JT on EDM</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2008/03/14/heres-how-edm-addresses-a-gap-in-model-driven-engineering/comment-page-1/#comment-13155</link>
		<dc:creator>Decision Management and software development II - Model Driven Engineering &#187; JT on EDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 02:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/2008/03/14/heres-how-edm-addresses-a-gap-in-model-driven-engineering/#comment-13155</guid>
		<description>[...] have posted before about using decision management with MDE and answered some questions from a reader on MDE but I thought his comment was particularly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have posted before about using decision management with MDE and answered some questions from a reader on MDE but I thought his comment was particularly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2008/03/14/heres-how-edm-addresses-a-gap-in-model-driven-engineering/comment-page-1/#comment-9382</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 07:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/2008/03/14/heres-how-edm-addresses-a-gap-in-model-driven-engineering/#comment-9382</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Excellent article - I have bookmarked it for later viewing and forwarded it on. 

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Excellent article &#8211; I have bookmarked it for later viewing and forwarded it on. </p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T-Enterprise</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2008/03/14/heres-how-edm-addresses-a-gap-in-model-driven-engineering/comment-page-1/#comment-9249</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Enterprise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/2008/03/14/heres-how-edm-addresses-a-gap-in-model-driven-engineering/#comment-9249</guid>
		<description>Excellent article - cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article &#8211; cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan den Haan</title>
		<link>http://jtonedm.com/2008/03/14/heres-how-edm-addresses-a-gap-in-model-driven-engineering/comment-page-1/#comment-9237</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan den Haan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtonedm.com/2008/03/14/heres-how-edm-addresses-a-gap-in-model-driven-engineering/#comment-9237</guid>
		<description>Hi James,

You&#039;re definitely right! Just one sentence &quot;If possible it should take a form which is understandable by all interested stakeholders including customers.&quot; is way to less to underline the importance of involving the non-technical user in the process. In the part about modelling dimenstions I&#039;ve talked about the stakeholder-modelling-dimension. My opinion is that different models are needed to create a software artefact. Most models should be at the point of the business expert on the stakeholder-modelling-dimension, but there are some models which can&#039;t be there (like a security model).

Anyway, the business user should be in a central position! That&#039;s also the focus we have at Mendix (the company I work for). The primary user of our MDE tooling is the business analist.

-Johan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi James,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re definitely right! Just one sentence &#8220;If possible it should take a form which is understandable by all interested stakeholders including customers.&#8221; is way to less to underline the importance of involving the non-technical user in the process. In the part about modelling dimenstions I&#8217;ve talked about the stakeholder-modelling-dimension. My opinion is that different models are needed to create a software artefact. Most models should be at the point of the business expert on the stakeholder-modelling-dimension, but there are some models which can&#8217;t be there (like a security model).</p>
<p>Anyway, the business user should be in a central position! That&#8217;s also the focus we have at Mendix (the company I work for). The primary user of our MDE tooling is the business analist.</p>
<p>-Johan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

