4th March 2008

A post to replace a comment because Tibco can’t count…

James Taylor Posted by James Taylor
Categories: Business Rules

At least it’s blog cannot. I saw this post by my old friend Paul Vincent – Business rule execution: stateless/transactional, stateful/monitoring, or both? and tried to comment on it. Sadly the Tibco blog can’t add 6 and 2 and so rejected my comment (the sum was spam protection). So here’s my comment:
I am not sure I agree 100%. The argument sounds a little like “I have a CEP engine, what could I do with it” rather than taking a business problem and seeing how best to address it. For most insurance companies, real-time or even intra-day events are rare and significance in those things rarer still. It is a low event volume business. I don’t buy the stateful advantages to #2 and #3 is a data problem, not an event one.
CEP has lots of potential applications but this did not seem compelling to me….

This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 4th, 2008 at 6:21 pm and written by James Taylor. It is filed under Business Rules.
Tags:, , , , , , , ,
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “A post to replace a comment because Tibco can’t count…”

  1. Paul Vincent says:

    I’m pretty sure the TIBCO blog is *not* running any Complex Comment Processing!

Leave a Reply

Hire me

Decision Management News

DMSA monthly newsletter dedicated to decision management


About

Blog Partners

PAW
15% discount code - BLOGJTDC09
SDC
MVP

Categories

Latest Series

More Links

Archives

Tag Cloud

Subscribe


 Subscribe to this blog
Enter your Email

Hear Me Speak

Gartner BPM
Advanced Decisioning for Process Excellence
October 5-7, 2009

Predictive Analytics World
Putting Predictive Analytics to Work presentation and tutorial
October 19-21, 2009

EDM Summit
Decision Management keynote and tutorial
November 1-5, 2009

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Recent Trackbacks

The Book

Popular Tags